Popular posts from this blog
4 websites
great portraits 1. on the website i read about tips to take a really good portrait. these included lighting, personality, camera setting, and posing. i learned that there are certain aspects to taking a good portrait that benefits not only the photographer but the model as well, that i don't necessarily think about when i'm taking pictures. 2. why i chose this photo: her hair stands out from the blue/gray wall, and how she isn't smiling. rules of photography: lines, balance, depth of field who took it: dijon bowden spiral staircases 1. on the website i read about an architect photographer from a small town in germany. he goes to many abandoned houses and takes pictures of the staircases. he has a collection of these photos titled "abandoned staircases". 2. why i chose this photo: something about it looked different than the other staircases, the window is centered with the railing on the landing. rules of photography: lines, depth of field, balance, view...
photo manipulation / ethics
a. some of the main points are anyone can edit a photo in a matter of seconds, when before it would have taken hours. "any technique that can alter the original scene or image captured by the camera is considered unethical". b. the Washington Post and the New York times provide their photographers with strict guidelines on how to shoot and edit their photographs. one of these rules is "no colors will be altered form the original scene photographed". c. acceptable things to do to an image that doesn't cross the line into an unethical manipulation is adding a bit of color, and cropping something that isn't as important out of the picture. d. this photo is the most unethical because Oprah's head is photoshopped onto another woman's body, which is very disrespectful and rude. e. this photo manipulation is very minor because all they did was change her teeth which isn't really a big deal.
Comments
Post a Comment